Go Back   DealershipForum.com > Domestic Franchises and Independent Dealers > Chrysler > Sales

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2010, 05:11 AM   #1
kaks
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
Default Dealership consolidation

Well September 2010 has come and gone and doesn't look like Chrysler is sticking to their guns about stand alone Dodge, Jeep, or Chrysler dealers. What's up with that???
kaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2010, 05:54 AM   #2
steve_biegler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaks View Post
Well September 2010 has come and gone and doesn't look like Chrysler is sticking to their guns about stand alone Dodge, Jeep, or Chrysler dealers. What's up with that???
State franchise laws are back in effect....thats whats up! Makes it hard for them to steal businesses from people.
steve_biegler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2010, 09:23 AM   #3
XDCX
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 14,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaks View Post
Well September 2010 has come and gone and doesn't look like Chrysler is sticking to their guns about stand alone Dodge, Jeep, or Chrysler dealers. What's up with that???
As I recall, Grady's indicated in the past that 100% of Chrysler's U.S. Dealer Network will be full-line CJDR by the end of 2011. When you think about it, it's really not too far away and I haven't heard much chatter about any consolidation efforts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_biegler View Post
State franchise laws are back in effect....thats whats up! Makes it hard for them to steal businesses from people.
Exactly.

I think it will be interesting to see what happens with Ford's plans to reduce 40% of their Lincoln stores in the metro markets. Without the total control that bankruptcy provides Ford may find it's hard to convince dealers to walk away and take a buy-out check.

In fact, I've been thinking about writing a Press Release and inviting the Lincoln Dealers to the forum. I think there's a lot they could learn from the 789 terminated Chrysler dealers - mostly that it's more difficult to run a stand-alone used car operation than it appears.
XDCX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 05:56 AM   #4
Noah
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 135
Default

A minor (but crucial) adjustment to your comment above:

"I think that there's a lot they could learn from the 789 terminated Chrysler dealers - mostly that it's more difficult to run a stand-alone used car operation than it appears" ...particularly given the size of facility that these dealers operate from, and the fixed costs associated with the square-footage associated with stores sized as mainline new car retail operations.

Respectfully:
It's not any harder to sell used cars than it is to sell new ones. People are people, if you can sell you can sell; the rejected 789 were/are smart dealers who know how to move metal. But it is exponentially more diffult to make money doing so, when your fixed cost nut is associated with the revenue stream of a new car franchise. Particularly, the high-gross revenue that flows though the service dept as a result of a 'captive' customer base coming in for warranty service.
Noah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 07:33 AM   #5
CL Pgh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaks View Post
Well September 2010 has come and gone and doesn't look like Chrysler is sticking to their guns about stand alone Dodge, Jeep, or Chrysler dealers. What's up with that???
On the bright side... you won't be signing the new Dealer Agreement... and let me tell you... It Is Not Nice!!!
CL Pgh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 12:56 PM   #6
XDCX
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 14,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noah View Post
A minor (but crucial) adjustment to your comment above:

"I think that there's a lot they could learn from the 789 terminated Chrysler dealers - mostly that it's more difficult to run a stand-alone used car operation than it appears" ...particularly given the size of facility that these dealers operate from, and the fixed costs associated with the square-footage associated with stores sized as mainline new car retail operations.

Respectfully:
It's not any harder to sell used cars than it is to sell new ones. People are people, if you can sell you can sell; the rejected 789 were/are smart dealers who know how to move metal. But it is exponentially more diffult to make money doing so, when your fixed cost nut is associated with the revenue stream of a new car franchise. Particularly, the high-gross revenue that flows though the service dept as a result of a 'captive' customer base coming in for warranty service.
Excellent comment - I agree 100%.

I know there were a lot of companies that wanted to help the OLDCO dealers fill the void in the service department - NAPA, Midas, Sears, Autostar, etc. but I don't know how successful they've been.

I've also heard from dealers who kept their service department open that it was hard to offset the loss of warranty work. Many of their loyal customers would go to a franchised dealer because they wanted to get warranty and retial repairs addressed at the same time.
XDCX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM wants to step-up Dealer Consolidation XDCX Sales 3 02-12-2008 09:43 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright DealershipForum.com - 2008 - 2016