Quote:
Originally Posted by tnpartsguy
It appears narrower, but otherwise not that different when compared side-by-side.
|
Thanks for the info - I guess I read so much about the lower weight of the 2016 Camaro I just assumed it was a smaller car overall.
It will be interesting to see how the 4 Cylinder Camaro sells. As I understand it the horsepower and performance of the 2.0 Turbo matches what the 5.7 Camaros were capable of in the late 80s to mid 90s.