View Single Post
Old 12-17-2015, 09:33 AM   #3
XDCX
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 14,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tnpartsguy View Post
It appears narrower, but otherwise not that different when compared side-by-side.
Thanks for the info - I guess I read so much about the lower weight of the 2016 Camaro I just assumed it was a smaller car overall.

It will be interesting to see how the 4 Cylinder Camaro sells. As I understand it the horsepower and performance of the 2.0 Turbo matches what the 5.7 Camaros were capable of in the late 80s to mid 90s.
XDCX is offline   Reply With Quote